If your department is like many most it offers an introductory no-prerequisites course. It’s the course to recruit (or select out) department minors & majors. It may even be a “core” course required for all students in your “school.” Can you picture students who take that course?
Next, think of a research paper you’re working on. Given 20 minutes in front of that undergraduate course audience could you contextualize, describe, and facilitate a compelling discussion of your research?
If you answered “yes,” congratulations! Well done. If you answered “no,” is it because (a) your research is still too fuzzy, (b) the topic is too arcane or (c) your work make a strong theory contribution in a sub-discipline with little practical relevance?
It’s a fair response that undergraduate student interest may be an irrelevant objective anyway. Nonetheless, it seems to me answers (a) and (b) don’t bode well for publishable research. Answer (c) looks like a juicy rationalization. So perhaps it is a question worth considering.
What do you think?
Filed under: Dissertation topics, Research | 2 Comments »
